首页 服务指南 SCI学术发表支持 投稿前同行评审

投稿前同行评审

期刊一般要经过2~3个月的审稿周期才能决定一篇文章是否能发表，导致科研人员浪费了大量的时间，甚至会耽误文章发表的最佳时机。 EditSprings的预审服务，可以在7个工作日内，由权威杂志审稿人帮您逐条分析文章存在的问题、推荐3本适合的目标期刊，让您投稿前就能更正文章中可能引起拒稿的问题，精准定位目标期刊，加快投稿的进程，提高投稿命中率。

投稿前同行评审服务内容

1、艾德思投稿前同行评审服务可以给我提供什么服务？

服务时间+价格 投稿前同行评审服务内容
2500元/份
7个工作日 		1. 审查研究背景与研究是否相符、介绍是否全面7. 评估语言是否规范、适合发表
2. 审查立论是否合理8. 检查图表、统计方法是否使用正确
3. 审查研究设计是否不当、缺乏严谨9. 检查文献引用是否充分或过时
4. 审查数据和结论是否不一致或分析推理错误10. 逐条提出改进建议
5. 审查讨论是否相关、充分或累赘11. 评估文章与作者选定的目标期刊的匹配度
6. 审查全文叙事结构是否合理12. 推荐3本期刊并做优先排序
立即上传稿件

2、谁来审阅我的稿件呢？

审核稿件

EditSprings拥有150余名覆盖238个学科、1200+细分研究领域的同行评议专家：

学科内权威杂志的现任审稿人 欧美著名科研院所的教授和研究员 指导发表多篇高水平SCI文章 十分熟悉学科前沿热点和发表要求

我们会根据您的具体研究领域为您匹配最合适的专家进行预审。

3、我需要提交什么材料

文章全文

附件材料（理想期刊、投稿历史、审稿意见等）（请 下载文章预审附件表 进行填写）

投稿前同行评审服务内容

01.EditSprings的欧美学术专家（期刊审稿人）会从研究意义、创新性、语言，以及文章摘要、材料方法、讨论、结果，图表分析等全方面来综合评估您文章的整体学术水平，并指出文章的可提高部分。

EditSprings Expert Academic Assessment Report

Materials and methods

What is the specific significance of the findings?
The specific significance of the present findings is mainly relying on the new insights provided in relation to the surface chemistry and electronic properties of different types of sp2/sp3-hybridized nanocarbon materials. Given their extensive use in the field of catalysis, the present results provide valuable information in relation to the underlying mechanism of carbon-catalyzed reactions.

Novelty

The novelty level of the findings
The novelty of the present work is the elucidation of the essential differences between conventional sp2-hybridized nanocarbons(NCs) and sp3-hybridized ultra-dispersed nanodiamonds(NDs) and theirs' derivatives(UNDDs), by means of advanced characterization techniques, such as EELS, XPS, etc. More importantly, probe reactions were employed to fully gain insight into structure-property relationships. The novelty level is considered very good.
What new discoveries or conclusions are presented?
The present findings clearly revealed that the differences in surface chemistry (e.g. oxygen defects) and electronic properties(e.g. work function) can be mainly accounted for the diferences in catalytic activity. In this regard, the superior reactivity of UNDDs can receive a consistent explanation; the specific electronic structure and the lower work function of UNDDs are mainly responsible for the enhanced catalytic activity.

Abstract

Does the abstract concisely and accurately state the basic content of a finding?
Towards improving the abstract of the present article the following issues should be considered:
- it should outine the methods used to accomplish the main objectives
- it should shortly present the main findings
- it should draw the main conclusions

Introduction

Does the introduction contain complete reference to enable the reader to clearly place the current work in the context of what is already known?
The latest advances in the field should be clearly stated and shortly discussed, in order the originality and the novelty of the present work to be revealed. In particular, the argument that"the essential differences between a UNDD system and conventional NCs in catalytic reactions have rarely been studied"should be justified. What about the studies so far performed in relation to surface chemistry and catalytic properties of NDs-based materials?
Is there a lack of association between the findings and prior research?
Although the latest works in the field are properly cited, there is no corresponding discussion about the recent developments in the field towards revealing the step beyond attempted in the present study. Since the present work aims at exploring the physicochemical properties of UNDDs, the recent advances in the field should be clearly stated.

Materials and methods

Are enough details provided for a compe-tent worker to repeat the study and reproduce the results?
Materials and Methods were not provided. However, based on the online supporting information of the aforementioned paper the following issues should be considered:
- Not enough information is provided about the preparation of GR and MWCNTs
- The reaction conditions(catalyst mass, flow rate, GHSV) should be clearly stated

Results

Are the data, digested and condensed.presented with important trends extracted and described?
YES. However, towards improving the impact of the present work the following issues could be considered:
Besides TPD, TPR studies could be also carried out to gain insight into the reactivity of different oxygen functional groups(surface, bulk, interface) as well as into the oxygen storage capacity (OSC). These studies are expected to shed more light towards establishing a more reliable structure-activity relationship.

Discussion

Does the discussion rest firmly on theevide-nce presented in the results section?
To improve the impact of the present work towards publishing in a higher IF journal the following issues should be also considered:
1) The relationship between sp2(%), SBET and conductivity should be discussed in a more thorough manner.
2) The catalytic activity is mainly related with the work function.
It could be of major importance to provide/discuss the role of other identifying parameters(conductivity. oxygen abundance, surface area, etc) on the catalytic activity. Despite the fact that a completely different type of probe reactions is employed
(one oxidation and one reduction process)a similar trend is obtained(Fig.5). An explanation should be provided.

02.EditSprings的欧美学术专家（期刊审稿人）会根据文章评估结果，结合您的目标期刊发表标准，判定您的文章与目标期刊是否匹配。

The suitability to the intended journal

The intended journal:Chemical Communications

Is the manuscript suitable to be submitted to this journal?
YES
Advantages of submiting the manuscript to the jourmal recommended
Publishes urgent, high quality communications from across the chemical sciences; high impact factor and readability: the fastest publisher of articles providing information on new avenues of research.
Disadvantages of submitting the manuscri-pt to the journal recommended

03.EditSprings的欧美学术专家（期刊审稿人）会根据文章评估结果，结合您的发表期望，筛选3家与您文章最匹配的目标期刊并分析期刊利弊，供您投稿参考，也可以作为您目前期刊之外的备投期刊。

EditSprings Journal Recommendation Report

No.1 The Most Likely Target Journal

Journal Name: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Impact Factor: 4.123
Website:http: /www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/about-journals/PCCP/
Review process: 2 weeks
Publication cycle: three-step process,i.e. manuscript submission, peer review and post-acceptance preparation. The timeline depends mainly on the length of review process.
Advantages of submitting the manuscript to the journal recommended
publication of cutting-edge original work in physical chemis-try; high impact factor and readability, highly cited articles; rigorous and fair peer review process.
Disadvantages of submitting the manuscri-pt to the joumal recommended
The article could be published in journals of higher impact factor if suitably modified(see comments above). In that case new experiments in conjunction with major modifications are required by authors.

No.2 The Second-choice journal

Journal Name: Nanoscale
Impact Factor: 7.367
Website:http: //www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/about-journals/nanoscale/
Review process: 2-3 weeks
Publication cycle: three-step process,i.e. manuscript submission, peer review and post-acceptance preparation. The timeline depends mainly on the length of review process.
Advantages of submitting the manuscript to the journal recommended
A high impact international journal publishing high quality research across nanoscience and nanotechnology;high impact factor,highly cited articles
Disadvantages of submitting the manuscri-pt to the joumal recommended
There may be a risk of rejection.

No.3 The third-choice journal

Journal Name: ACS Catalysis
Impact Factor: 10.614
Website:http: //pubs.acs.org/journal/accacs
Review process: 2-3 weeks
Publication cycle: three-step process,i.e. manuscript submission, peer review and post-acceptance preparation. The timeline depends mainly on the length of review process.
Advantages of submitting the manuscript to the journal recommended
One of the best jourmals in catalysis;high impact factor and readability;highly cited articles
Disadvantages of submitting the manuscri-pt to the joumal recommended
There may be a risk of rejection.
立即上传稿件

常见问题

Q 我自己选好了目标期刊了，那评审专家还会建议更合适的期刊给我吗？

评审专家会评估文章与您选定的期刊之间的匹配程度，此外，他们也会推荐3个期刊作为备选。

Q 使用你们的投稿前同行评审服务能保证我的文章一定被接收吗？

文章的发表与否取决于多种因素：研究内容、写作质量、创新性、重要性与期刊匹配程度等等。而且在众多的投稿文章中，期刊会选择最优秀的、最合适的文章进行出版，即使您的文章本身没有质量问题，也只有少部分文章能够成功发表。
因此，我们无法保证您的文章百分百会发表。我们的预审服务会全面评估这些因素，让您在正式投稿之前有机会快速修正对您投稿不利的因素，帮助您大幅提升成功发表的几率。

Q 我根据你们给出的评审意见进行修改了，你们还会继续帮我审查修改后的内容或者重新帮我推荐期刊吗？

一次服务只包含一次文章评审和一次期刊推荐。如果您根据我们的评审意见进行了修改后仍然需要我们的服务，您需要重新提交订单。

Q 你们可以帮我进行文章的修改吗？

投稿前同行评审服务可以帮您进行文章的学术审查以及语言规范性审查，但是我们不会对您的文章做任何改动。对于评审专家给您提出的修改建议，需要您自己改动。如果您需要修改服务，请选用我们的 文章修改服务，如果您需要语言润色服务，请选用我们的 文章润色服务。

Q 这个投稿前同行评审服务有几个同行评议专家来评阅呢？

我们的标准服务为您提供1个同行评审专家的意见。您也可以选择多个专家为您进行预审，获得多视角观点，减少个人偏见，使文章内容更加完善，大幅增加成功发表的机会。每增加一个专家，您需要额外支付服务费用，但服务时间相同。
首页 服务指南 SCI学术发表支持 投稿目标期刊推荐

投稿目标期刊推荐

目标投稿期刊选择不当是导致拒稿的最常见原因之一，但从超过3万种国际学术期刊中选择合适的目标期刊又费时又费力，对于投稿新手而言更是难上加难。

EditSprings艾德思的期刊推荐服务，是由学术专家审阅您的文稿，在评估您文章学术水平的基础上，结合您的发表期望，从浩瀚的SCI期刊库中遴选3个学术刊物并分析选择每家学术刊物的利弊，给您建议最合适的目标期刊，并说明首选期刊失利时可供选择的次选期刊。

EditSprings艾德思期刊推荐服务将向您提供一份文章学术评估报告和期刊推荐报告，为您节省时间、节省精力的同时，以专业性推荐使您的文章与目标期刊最相匹配，提高您投稿的成功率。

目标期刊推荐服务

期刊推荐数 服务时间 价格 (元/份) 文章评估 期刊推荐
3个目标期刊 5个工作日 ￥2000/份

研究价值性评估

研究创新性评估

探究系统性评估

论述严谨性评估

语言规范性评估

期刊信息

期刊排序

利弊分析

同行文章
立即上传稿件

推荐专业性保障

1、学术专家团队

学术专家团队

1.学术专家均有博士学位，现均就职于欧美高校和科研院所；

2.学术专家均为副教授以上职称，有10年以上学科研究背景，对前沿热点十分了解；

3.学术专家均至少发表过10篇以上SCI文章，对学科内期刊如数家珍；

4.学术专家均有5年以上SCI/EI期刊审稿、编辑经验，对SCI期刊偏好十分熟悉。

2、期刊推荐流程

期刊推荐流程

1.对文章内容进行综合评估，分析文章的主要优势和存在的问题，对文章的研究意义、创新性、逻辑结构、严谨性和语言规范性等方面进行评价，并出具评估报告；

2.结合作者期望以及参考同行文章发表情况，推荐3家学术期刊备选并排序，给出推荐理由及利弊分析；

3.提供简要的期刊点评信息，例如期刊研究领域、影响因子、审稿时间、发表周期等；

4.最终出具推荐报告。

3、我们需要您提供哪些材料或信息：

您对目标期刊的期望（影响因子范围、审稿周期、发表周期等）；

您文章的全文（含图表及参考文献）；

您文章的投稿历史信息（第几次投稿，是否被拒，被拒期刊名，退修历史，审稿意见）；

其他支持性或补充性信息。

目标期刊案例推荐

01. EditSprings艾德思的欧美学术专家（期刊审稿人）会从研究意义、创新性、语言，以及文章摘要、材料方法、讨论、结果，图表分析等全方面来综合评估您文章的整体学术水平，并指出文章的可提高部分。

EditSprings Expert Academic Assessment Report

Significance

Whether the findings possess the promise for theoretical research or application in the field related?
The present paper is a significant study in numerical turbulent combustion which can be used in several combustion applications, and it is one of the complex research topics in the field of combustion.
What is the specific significance of the findings?
Authors could able to simulate a numerical turbulent combustion with heat loss and fuel stratification using a valuable FGM method which is completely compatible with experimental data in a lot of physical cases, as it is shown in the Fig.16.Although there are some simplification such as fixing Lewis Number into 1, the overall value of the current work is high enough to be published in one of the reputable journals in the field of combustion.

Novelty

What kind of new technologies or methods is applied that deserved to be recommend-ed?
A novel numerical method entitled FGM.
What new discoveries or conclusions are presented?
The application of FGM in combustion with heat loss, fuel stratification and turbulence has never been studied in literature. It means that the whole of the paper, especially the application of FGM in turbulent combustion is new and novel.

Systematicness

Whether the research is systematically or scientifically designed and performed.
To be honest, the organization of the current paper has some issues. Forinstance, section 2-Combustion Modeling: the Flamelet-Generated Manifold Method-shouldn't be a separate section. It would be combined by introduction section, as it also a literature review section. There are also some weaknessesinside the text. For example, sentences which have been highlighted with yellow color are completely simple sentences which would be eliminated from the text. In addition, some sentences which have been highlighted with violet color must have appropriate references, as they are some findings from the literature. Please find the attached file to see the highlighted sentences. Furthermore, in some sentences the number of used references should be decreased into maxi- mum 2or 3 references. This references have been highlighted by green color in the attached file.

Preciseness

Whether the data is analyzed in the right way.
Yes, the presented data have been analyzed in an appropriate format, although in some cases there are some weaknesses. For example, as it is mentioned before, some scientific sentences need to have appropriate references, which have been highlighted in violet color in the attached PDF file.
Whether the results and conclusion are demonstrated in the right way.
Just in figure number 3, permission of the publisher should be received before republishing the mentioned figure in the text.

Language

Is the language qualified for publication?
Yes, it is. There is no issue in the language of the current paper.

Comments

Assess the overall academic level of the manuscript, and give the targeted IF range.
As it is a valuable piece in the field of turbulent combustion phenomenon,I think that it can be published in relevant and technical journals by IF range of 3-5. The best journal for this paper is Combustion and Flame which has a normal IF, and it's 4.168. In my point of view, the relevance of the joumal to the paper is moreimportant than the IF of the journal, and as I said before, based on the value of the paper,I suggest technical journals such as "Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, IF=4.303"and "Combustion and Flame, IF=4.168.

02. EditSprings的欧美学术专家会根据文章评估结果，结合您的发表期望，筛选3家与您文章最匹配的目标期刊并分析期刊利弊，供您投稿参考。

EditSprings Journal Recommendation Report

No.1 The Most Likely Target Journal
Level(1/2/3)2
Journal Name:Combustion and Flame
Impact Factor: 4.168
Website:https: /www.journals.elsevier.com/combustion-and-flame
Review process:(time) It depends on the re-viewer but normally it's about three months for this joumal.
Publication cycle: 6 months
Prior publications:
1. Van Oijen, JA, Lammers,F, de Goey,L.P.H.: Combustion and Flame,127:2124-2134,2001.
2. Shinjo,J. Matsuyama,S, Mizobuchi,Y, Ogawa,S: Combustion and Flame,150:277-291,2007.
3. Nguyen,P.D, Vervisch,L, Subramanian,V., Domingo,P.: Combustion and Flame:157:43-61,2010.
Advantages and disadvantages of submitti-ng the manuscript to the journal recommended
The advantage of submitting this paper to Combustion and Flame journal is that the mentioned journal is very reputable in the field of combustion phenomenon although it has low IF comparing to the others.Disadvantages of submiting this paper to Combustion and Flame jourmal is that the review process in this journal sometimes is unacceptable and too long.It need a little patience.
No.2 The Second-choice journal
Level(1/2/3)2
Journal Name:Proceeding of the Combusti-on Institute
Impact Factor: 4.303
Website:https:/www.journals.elsevier.com/proceedings-of-the-combustion-institute
Review process:(time) It's too fast, and it's about 2-3months which depends on the paper. It changes based on the nominated reviewers to review the paper.
Publication cycle: 2～3 months
Prior publications:
1. Bell,J.B., Day,M.S. Grcar,J.F, Lijewski,M.J., DriscollJ.F, Filatyev,S.A,: Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, 31:1299-1307,2007.
2. Donini,A, Bastiaans,R.J.M, van Oijen,J.A, de Goey,L.P.H: Proceeding of the Combustion Institute,35:831-837,2015.
3. Van Oijen,J.A., Bastiaans,R.J.M., Groot,G.R.A, de Goey,L.P.H: Proceeding of the Combustion Institute,30:657-664,2005.
Advantages and disadvantages of submiing themanuscript to the journal recommende-d
Although it is the valuable journal in the field of combustion. it has strict roles which make it very hard to publish a paperthere.But the advantages of this journal is its reviewing time which is about 2-3 months.
No.3 The third-choice journal
Level(1/2/3)3
Journal Name:Flow,Turbulence and Comb-ustion
Impact Factor: 1.863
Website:https:/link.springer.com/journal/10494
Review process:(time) It's too fast, and it's about 6～12 weeks which depends on the paper. Meanwhile, it is easy to be accept.
Publication cycle: 6~12 weeks
Prior publications:
1. Vreman,A.W, van Oijen,J.A, de Goey,L.P.H, Bastiaans,R.J.M, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion,82:511-535,2009.
2. Ravikanti,M., Malalasekera,W, Hossain,M., Mahmud,T, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion,81:301-319,2008.
Advantages and disadvantages of submitti-ng the manuscript to the journal recomme-nded
It is more relevant to the current paper, but it has a lower IF. So, it may have a short review time, but it will be more difficult to address the comment, and it has a low IF comparing to the two previous journals.
立即上传稿件
首页 服务指南 SCI学术发表支持 图表服务

图表服务

根据EditSprings的经验，研究成果的成功发表，不仅依赖于流畅、专业、地道的语言，高质量的图表也是影响文章发表的重要一环。而且越有影响力的SCI期刊对图表的质量要求也就越高。但是对文章作者而言，繁杂多样的各式图表的编辑制作可能费时费力，甚至有时无从下手。

为提高科学文章投稿效率，保证图表质量，EditSprings组建了一支涵盖众多科研领域的研究人员，为客户提供学术图表服务，以达到期刊的规范图表要求。无论您是现有图表需要重新编辑，原始数据需要重新制图还是需要绘制全新的示意图、流程图，我们将竭尽所能为您提供帮助。

服务类型 服务时间 价格 服务内容
图表编辑 2个工作日 ￥150/图 1.格式（tiff、jpg、png、bmp、psd、gif、pdf）；
2.尺寸（放大倍数受分辨率限制）；
3.颜色模式（RGB、CMYK、灰度等）；
4.分辨率（受原始图片分辨率限制）；
5.标注（文字、箭头、简单线条等）；
6.图片组合（无需重新绘制的图表组合）。
图表制作 3个工作日 ￥400/图 1.根据数据表作图（柱形图、饼图、条形图、线形图、散点图等）；
2.按杂志要求进行图表局部处理（裁切、标记、标尺、颜色、对比度、亮度、饱和度、局部模糊等）；
3.图表格式处理。
图表绘制 2-7个工作日 ￥800/图 1.重绘低分辨率的流程图和示意图；
2.根据草图（或参考图）绘制流程图和示意图；
3.根据作者的文字描述或参考资料（无草图或参考图）绘制示意图或流程图；
4.其他设计图。

*注：
1）图表服务需要您提供可靠的最终版原始素材并清晰描述您的服务需求；
2）我们目前接受以下文件类型的图表：DOC, DOCX，PPT, PPTX，ODP，XLS, XLSX，OPJ ，CDR , AI，AIT，PSD, PDD，jpg，png等。
3）图表绘制服务将根据您图表绘制的难度与工作量综合报价。

立即上传稿件

图表服务案例

图表绘制服务实例

绘制前

手绘草图或者分辨率低的示意图

绘制后

高清示意图、演示图

图表绘制服务实例

制作前

数据表或其他数据图表素材

制作后

首页 服务指南 SCI学术发表支持 格式排版

格式排版

投稿之前，您的文章必须严格按照期刊的Guidelines要求进行格式排版。格式完美的排版会使文章更加条理清晰，让期刊编辑很容易准确把握文章主旨，还会给期刊编辑留下严谨的印象，为文章被顺利接收奠定良好的基础。

但是根据EditSprings的经验，很多客户都会遇到以下的问题：

01.期刊的Guidelines条陈又多又繁琐，修改格式要占用大量的时间和精力

02.有些格式怎么调也不对，还是被期刊打回

03.好不容易排版好了，转投另一个期刊时，又要重新修改格式

现在，EditSprings可以帮助您对文稿进行系统化的格式排版，以让您的文章完全符合您目标期刊的规格要求，帮助您的文章更顺利的进入审稿进程，让您有更多时间投入到研究中去。

服务项目 服务时间 价格 服务内容
格式排版 3个工作日 ￥800/篇
（ <8000单词） 		1.文章结构顺序的编排（标题、标题页、摘要等结构及布局，图表放置等）
2.格式修改（字号、行距、缩进、多级标题、加粗或倾斜等，图表标题及说明，空行、分页等）
3.参考文献格式修改以及校对
长文排版 3个工作日 ￥1000/篇
（ ≥8000单词）

*注：
1）我们目前接受以下文件类型的文稿：DOC,DOCX，EndNote，LaTeX。若您以.tex形式提交文档，请将所有的LaTeX文档相关附属文件（例如，图表，.sty，.CLS，.bib格式的文件等）一并上传以作参考。由于LaTeX文档无法保留修订痕迹，我们将另有PDF文档来展示修改情况。
2）参考文献的校对与排版仅限按投稿期刊要求的正确格式排版，不包括所引文献结论正确性的内容校对。
3）此项服务不含图表服务，如需图表格式编辑、图表制作、绘图服务请选择EditSprings的学术图表服务，EditSprings的图表设计师会为您提供专业的学术图表服务。
4）格式排版服务的前提是您已经有拟投期刊，如您还未选定期刊，可以选用EditSprings的期刊推荐服务或 文章预审服务，EditSprings的学术专家将为您评估文章并推荐3家目标期刊。
5）此项服务不包含字数缩减、母语润色等服务，如需相关服务请选用EditSprings的文章润色服务或文章指导修改服务，编辑会为您的文章进行母语润色或文章深度指导与修改。

立即上传稿件

专业品质保证

EditSprings的专业编辑会严格按照您的目标期刊Guidelines里各项文章格式的要求来进行排版，使您的文稿格式符合投稿期刊的特定要求。同时，EditSprings的专业编辑会提示您材料中所缺的元素，需要您配合提交，确保您的文章将根据您的目标期刊的指引进行排版。

如果您对于排版后的稿件有任何疑问，请联系我们。此外，您的目标期刊对您的文章提出任何格式问题，请将您发送给期刊的文件以及从期刊获得全部意见发送至您的客服邮箱，我们将免费对您的文章再次进行格式排版。

首页 服务指南 SCI学术发表支持 投稿协助

投稿协助服务

给目标期刊投稿时，需根据期刊的作者指南中的要求准备各项补充材料和文件，然后在期刊的投稿系统上按步骤操作投稿。不同期刊的投稿要求与系统都不同，作者需要花费大量时间与精力去逐条查阅。

艾德思的投稿协助服务可以帮助作者检查稿件是否符合期刊要求、准备投稿确认事项清单、备齐投稿文件和填写申请表单，节省大量时间和精力，避免文章在初审时因不符合投稿规定而被拒稿 。

您需要提供的 艾德思投稿专家为您提供的 交付周期 服务价格
完整的论文 仔细审阅稿件，确保文稿符合目标期刊指南的提交要求。 3个工作日 ￥1200/次
图片与表格 准备投稿事项清单，严格依据期刊规定协助作者准备投稿必备文件。
目标期刊名称或URL链接 协助作者在线投稿，解答投稿过程中的疑问。
其他期刊要求提供的文件及信息 投稿完成后，将最终投稿版本的PDF文件发送给作者，以确认提交的全部内容。

*注： 此服务不包括格式排版，若文章未按期刊要求进行格式排版，请与格式排版服务一起使用。

常见问题

Q 我需要自己准备好所有投稿必须的文件和信息吗？

您提供正文和目标期刊后，投稿专家会根据文章内容及期刊投稿要求，列出需要作者提供的信息列表，您只需要配合投稿专家的要求即可。

Q 投稿后多久可以收到期刊的回复？

正常情况下期刊会在收到投稿的当天给作者发送投稿确认回执，通知作者期刊已收到投稿。至于审稿人的评审意见，一般视期刊的审稿周期而定。

Q 投稿被拒后，可以换期刊重新投吗？

由于决定文章是否被拒稿的决定因素是文章本身，投稿协助服务只能支持投同一期刊，不支持换期刊重投。如果需要换期刊重投，请联系学术顾问获取新的解决方案。
首页 服务指南 中文期刊发表

中文期刊发表服务

中文学术文章有固有的一套语法和格式。很多作者尽管具有优秀的科研水平，但写作和投稿经验不足，因此与优秀期刊及会议失之交臂。EditSprings组建了一支具有丰富相关专业的论文编辑和审稿经验的中文论文服务的专家，为客户提供中文期刊发表服务。

我们会根据您的论文研究领域选择相应专家进行编辑服务。通过使用EditSprings的中文期刊发表服务，广大作者提高了语言流畅度和逻辑的严密性，对科学内容描述更为严谨，从而提高科学文章的投稿效率，大幅提升文章命中率。

中文服务类型 服务时间 价格 服务内容
中文论文修改 10个工作日 ￥1.5/字
 由具备顶刊审稿经验的同行资深专家，结合文稿质量及目标期刊要求协同作者全文修改。
中文论文指导 5个工作日 ￥0.6/字
 由具备顶刊审稿经验的同行资深专家，结合文稿质量及目标期刊要求批注修改意见，指导作者修改。
中文论文润色 5个工作日 ￥0.6/字
 逐词逐句地检查语言语法，审查句子逻辑性，保证语言地道专业。
中文论文评估 5个工作日 ￥1000/份
 评估语言是否规范、是否适合发表及是否能发到到客户预期期刊。